Defendant

A Imprisonment for a period of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, from around 2002 to early 2012, had been serving as an insurance solicitor of the insurance company from around 2013 to early 2012, had subscribed to the telecommunications service of “bracker” which arbitrarily provides one telephone number (hereinafter “child number”) other than the mobile phone unique phone numbers (hereinafter “parent number”) with D (hereinafter “parent number”), and used not only personal information such as D’s name and resident registration number, but also personal information of the Defendant who became aware of while carrying out the insurance solicitor’s personal information. Although there was no traffic accident, Defendant A conspiredd with D to report the traffic accident to the insurance company and receive money under the agreement, as if a traffic accident occurred with multiple mother cell phone numbers of mother and child mobile phone numbers.

Defendant

B is the friendship of D.

1. On January 30, 2012, around 16:25, the Defendants and D proposed that, on the alleyway in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the same day, they leased one E-learning automobile under the name of Defendant B and deliver it to the said D, upon receipt of a request from D to request from them to set a siren, and that, at the above time D, Defendant B would be entitled to receive insurance money if he/she was hospitalized at the hospital. Defendant B, with the same content, reported to the staff of the call center where the name of the Victim Matz Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., the said automobile was purchased, as if he/she was able to know of the said car, as if he/she followed A, while driving the said car, and Defendant A was hospitalized into the pertinent Ma- bargaining automobile and sent it to the victim company by obtaining a written diagnosis issued by the victim under the name of the victim.

As above, the Defendants conspired with D in collusion.