logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.05.12 2017고단788
상습특수절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

A seized cuter (No. 1), a knife (No. 2), a knife (No. 2), and a drone.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime in attached Table 30,000, on the ground that the victim C was able to take away money and valuables from a commercial building and other structures, the business of which was completed during the night-time hours; (b) on December 31, 2016, the Defendant: (c) opened the CCTV gate with the front cover of the victim’s face and intruded into the inner entrance; and (d) opened the door of the closed warehouse; and (d) intruded the victim’s market price in the air conditioners at night; and (d) opened the 106,000 won in total, the market price of the victim’s house located in the air condition at night, from that time to March 22, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, F, N,O, and P;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (related to the verification of damaged goods of Q Mart)

1. On-site photographs and records of the case-related photographs;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned manner;

1. Articles 332, 331 (1), 330, and 342 of the Criminal Act (including inclusive) of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is that the Defendant had been sentenced to punishment on account of the same kind of larceny crimes several occasions, and the Defendant again went to the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was under the suspension of the present execution, and it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant on the ground that the crime is not committed.

arrow