Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, at around 01:00 on January 22, 2017, was on the Nab B B B B, on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to a person who inflicted damage on others E while drinking alcohol, on the ground that the Defendant was drinking by drinking alcohol.
500cc glass Maclju Maclocked the victim's head once.
In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness F;
1. The recording of statements made by witnesses D or G in the second public trial records;
1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;
1. A protocol of statement made by the police against D, or a protocol of interrogation of the police;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning G or F;
1. Investigation report (Attachment to a photograph of a letter sent by the suspect A to the victim D after the crime is committed) - Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to capture a letter message;
1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that the defendant 500cc glassped the victim as the victim's cup.
2. In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the Defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant 500cc glass Mackju’s head was the victim’s head once.
A. The victim and the Defendant’s daily Gam in the same place at the time consistently stated that from the investigative agency to this court, the Defendant left the victim’s head to 500c c c c sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc sc s