logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.30 2018고정2098
특수협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on June 2, 2018, the Defendant asked the location of the victim D(24 years old) who is a part-time student of the convenience store to purchase chip at the C convenience store located within the Young-si District B. In order to purchase chip on June 2, 2018, the Defendant set a time limit for each other on the grounds that the victim did not speak.

1. 특수협박 피고인은 2018. 6. 2. 03:30경 위 장소에 다시 찾아가 피해자와 재차 말다툼하며 시비가 붙자 휴대하고 있던 위험한 물건인 총포형 분사기를 2회 꺼내 피해자의 얼굴을 향해 들이밀며 “쏴 버린다, 죽여 버리겠다”는 등 욕설을 하며 피해자를 협박하였다.

2. In around 07:00 on June 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sought intimidation at the above place; and (b) made intimidation to the victim “I will come to governance, would come to 8 sibly, would come to sibly in the workplace; and (c) I would be waiting to die.”

3. No person who violates the Act on the Safety Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, Etc. shall use guns, swords, gas sprayers, electroshock weapons, or crossbows unless permitted purposes of use or any justifiable ground exists.

Nevertheless, on July 24, 2012, the Defendant used gun-type gas sprayers that he obtained permission on possession on July 24, 2012 in intimidation as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. In light of the above evidence, the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant case, which can be acknowledged through the victim’s statements, and the circumstances at the time of the occurrence, the Defendant asserted that the victim would have conflict with the victim regarding the specific developments and circumstances at the time of the occurrence of the instant case. However, in light of the situation at the time CCTV was taken and the police investigation process and empirical rule against the Defendant, the content of the victim’

And the gun type of this case.

arrow