logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.08.13 2017구합1381 (2)
여객자동차운송사업계획변경 행정처분 무효확인 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant’s change of the cross-city bus operation route against the Intervenor joining the Defendant on February 3, 2015.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 12, 1996, the Plaintiff is a passenger transport service provider who has commenced the transportation of airport buses with the limited license for the business scope prescribed by “the limitation on passenger (a contractor using an airport of an overseas travel enterprise)” and “the term of validity from December 12, 1996 to December 11, 1999 (3).” 2) The Plaintiff obtained from the Defendant on September 30, 1999, the term of validity of the limited license, “the limitation on passenger travel enterprise (a contractor using an overseas travel enterprise)”, “the limitation on passenger travel enterprise”, “the limitation on passenger bus transport business from December 12, 1999 to December 12, 199,” and “the limitation on international passenger transport business” (hereinafter “the limitation in this case”), “the limitation on international passenger transport business from July 18, 200 to Incheon Airport - the Incheon Airport - the Incheon Airport - the Incheon Airport - the Incheon Airport - the Incheon Airport - the limit on July 18, 2000.

DasanIC, DasanIC (E hotel), high speed (Y hotel, Yanananan-gu, Gyeongan), Kimpo Airport, (Hawawawa and Speed), Incheon Airport (E hotel) 268 May 24, 2620 (E hotel) Incheon Airport (E hotel) 265.132

B. On July 19, 1982, the Intervenor C issued the first license for passenger transport business with the type of business from the Defendant as a bus transport business (hereinafter “the first license”).

2) The Intervenor obtained a license for direct operation-type bus transport business (hereinafter referred to as “first route”) from the Defendant, and on February 1, 2005, after which the Intervenor obtained a license for direct operation-type bus transport business (hereinafter referred to as “first route”), the Intervenor obtained a license for the alteration of passenger transport service plan from the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “first route”) and then obtained a license for the alteration of passenger transport service plan on the route “Seoul (Seoul) - Jeonju (Seoul) - YOB (hereinafter referred to as “second route”) as follows: hereinafter referred to as “approval for alteration on February 1, 2005”).

was received.

system numbers change.

arrow