All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence in June, two years of suspended sentence in Defendant E, two years of suspended sentence in August, six months of imprisonment, six months of suspended sentence in Defendant F, and two years of suspended sentence in Defendant J: imprisonment in May) imposed on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. As to Defendant A, the above Defendant recognized and opposed to the crime, and appears to have faithfully lived from around 2011 to the day prior to the crime of this case, and there are favorable circumstances such as the game room business owner operating a game room that provided money and valuables to the Defendant in return for the provision of control information, and the K sought the Defendant’s preference by agreement with the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the above defendant abused that he is in the position of providing the police officer with speculative game information, thereby impairing the transparency and fairness of performing official duties by receiving money and valuables in return for providing control information to the game users, and actively participating in the concealment of criminal facts and concealment of evidence in T and the defendant B, which are the game room business owner, and the fact that there are a large number of different criminal records against the defendant, etc., the sentence of punishment is inevitable, and in full view of the various circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, criminal conduct, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of punishment is not determined to be improper because the sentence imposed by the court below is too inappropriate.

B. Although the above defendant F was committed in favor of and against the above defendant F, there are favorable circumstances such as the recognition of the crime and the degree of his participation. However, in light of the above defendant's aiding and abetting the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and committing the crime of this case at the same time during the grace period of one year after being sentenced to one year for a suspended sentence of six months due to the crime, the above defendant committed another crime of this case under the suspension of execution.