logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2015.09.25 2014가합9860
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share 5 million won with the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 20, 2015 to September 25, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the representative of the F organization that is a member of the “D Religious Organization Victim Countermeasures Group” (hereinafter “E organization”), and Defendant B is a company for publishing online newspapers, and operates online newspaper “G” (H and hereinafter). Defendant C is a reporter belonging to G.

B. The Defendants reported the articles listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2 of the Defendants as indicated in the separate sheet 1 and 2, as shown in the separate sheet 1, 2014 through April 20, 2015, as indicated in the separate sheet 22 articles (hereinafter referred to as “instant article 1 articles”) such as “I” on G website from April 14, 2014 to April 20, and as indicated in the separate sheet 2, reported the articles listed in the separate sheet 2.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there exists no dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's 1 through 13, 16 through 22, 34 through 37, and 44 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the act of reporting the article 1 of this case containing false facts, such as the plaintiff's assertion that he is "reforest deposit," constitutes an act of infringing the plaintiff's reputation, portrait rights, and reporting the article 2 of this case containing insulting expressions against the plaintiff constitutes an act of infringing the plaintiff's personality rights and portrait rights, and thus, the defendants are jointly obligated to pay compensation for mental damage to the plaintiff as stated in paragraph 1 of the claim. The defendant B is obligated to delete the article of this case as described in paragraph 2 of the claim, and if the article of this case is violated the duty of deletion, the defendant B is obligated to pay the enforcement fine as stated in paragraph 3 of the claim.

As to this, the Defendants are ① the table 1 attached hereto.

arrow