(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.02.06 2014고정243

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.02.06 2014고정243

상해

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2014, at around 20:24, the Defendant refused the calculation on the ground that foreign substances (invinyl chloride) was carried out in front of the above restaurant located in Ischeon-si C, and accordingly, the Defendant used the victim's breast in the course of wrapping with the victim D(59 years of age) and snicking with his hand, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Results of CCTV verification by this Court;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The non-guilty part of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (the sentence shall be suspended by taking into account the following factors: (a) of the suspended sentence (the defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 300,000 won; (b) the defendant shall be confined in a workhouse for the period converted to one day; (c) the defendant shall be confined in a workhouse; and (d) the defendant does not have any violence force on the part of the defendant; and (d) the defendant

1. On February 14, 2014, the Defendant of this part of the facts charged, around 20:24, refused the calculation on the ground that foreign substances (vinyl chloride) entered the cooling surface in front of the said restaurant located in Ischeon-si, Isacheon-si. Accordingly, in the course of the victim D (year 59) and wrapping with the victim’s d (age 59), the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., the victim’s breath of breath, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The defendant and the victim, even if based on each evidence submitted by the prosecutor (such as witness D, E, and G’s respective statutory statements, etc.), are not sufficient to recognize that the defendant and the victim have sustained the floor with each other in the process of fighting mutual body bodies, and each of the above evidence alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant suffered an injury by breaking the breath floor by making the bridge of the victim’s breath, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.08.25 2015노1408

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.07.11 2013고단461

-서울서부지방법원 2014.10.30 2014노839

-서울서부지방법원 2014.06.26 2013고정2618

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2015.10.15 2015고정94