beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s loans to the Plaintiff on May 23, 2014, Daegu District Court and racing-Support 2014Gau24621.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff with the Daegu District Court and the Daegu District Court 2014Gapo24621, which stated that “the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 38.99% per annum from April 21, 2014 to the date of full payment” with respect to KRW 7,369,783, and KRW 6,876,919, whichever was earlier, the said court rendered a decision on performance recommendation that “the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 38.9% per annum from April 21, 2014 to the date of full payment,” and the said decision on performance recommendation was served
B. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff as Daegu District Court and Daejeon Branch of 2014 Ghana24645, and the said court rendered a decision on performance recommendation with the effect that “the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 31.9% per annum from April 21, 2014 to the date of full payment” with respect to KRW 4,031,198, and KRW 3,834,955 from May 23, 2014. The said decision on performance recommendation was delivered to the Plaintiff around that time.
C. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff as the Daegu District Court and the Daegu District Court and the 2014 Ghana24638, and on May 23, 2014, the said court rendered a decision of performance recommendation with the purport that “the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 7,369,783 and the amount of KRW 6,876,919, calculated at the rate of 38.99% per annum from April 21, 2014 to the date of full payment,” and the said decision of performance recommendation was delivered to the Plaintiff around that time.
(hereinafter referred to as the “decision on Performance Recommendation” for each of the above A, B, and C). 【Ground for Recognition of Performance】 Facts without any dispute, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff did not obtain a loan from the defendant, and that the plaintiff's punishment B merely obtained a loan under the name of the plaintiff by forging an application for transaction in the name of the plaintiff, etc.
As to this, the defendant.