The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the Defendant’s grounds of appeal (e.g., the Defendant’s life as a security guard and the economic situation is difficult, and the Defendant’s wife as a disabled person should be supported, the lower court’s sentence imposing a fine of KRW 1.5 million is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case in light of the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's personality and behavior and environment, as the police officer dispatched after receiving a report that the defendant avoided the disturbance of the defendant and requested personal information for identification of identity, it is not good that the police officer obstructed the performance of official duties by selling the uniforms of the police officer's clothes. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the degree of damage, the degree of harm, and all other matters alleged in the records and arguments of this case, the court

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal for conclusion. It is so decided as per Disposition