logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2014.12.22 2014가합2341
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 64,442,609 as well as 5% per annum from April 26, 2013 to December 22, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Defendant is the Vice Director of the Ka Center and the Ka Center in the name of "D" in the name of "D" in the racing-si. The Defendant is the Vice Director of the Ka Center and the above Ka Center.

(2) On April 26, 2013, the Plaintiff was operating a motor vehicle by directly washing the motor vehicle at the Director General of the Provincial Office of the instant case, and the Plaintiff’s accident was occurred when the Plaintiff was immediately entering the Plaintiff’s right-hand edge during the sloping of the floor by using the sloping machine (hereinafter “the instant sloping machine”).

(3) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the so-called “instant accident” in this case, due to the instant accident, by causing injury to the right saves by the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of the right saves, by the guard for copying the right saves of the outer side of the right saves, and by removing the right saves of the right saves.

B. The defect in the establishment and preservation of a structure under Article 758(1) of the Civil Act refers to a state in which a structure fails to meet the safety requirements ordinarily required for its use. In determining whether such safety requirements are met, it shall be determined on the basis of whether the installer and custodian of the structure fulfilled the duty to take protective measures to the extent generally required by social norms in proportion to the risk of the structure.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 99Da39548, Jan. 14, 200). Each of the above evidence, the images of evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, 3, 8, 10, and 11; the court’s fact inquiry as of Jan. 27, 2014 into the Republic of Korea as of Jan. 27, 2014; the following circumstances are as follows, namely, the escape water of this case was worn out by using for a period of eight years to cover it; and the escape water of this case is due to severe vibration when it is operated unless the upper part of the unit of each set is emitted.

arrow