Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and A are married couple, and the victim D is the defendant's fraud.

1. At around 03:00 on March 3, 2013, Defendant A found the victim’s residence of the victim, 101-dong 701, Nancheon-si, F apartment building No. 101-dong 701, and the victim did not open an apartment door, Defendant A opened a small door door attached to the apartment corridor and collected his head with the window and intruded on the residence.

2. On March 3, 2013, at around 03:10, the Defendants’ co-principaled the Defendant’s co-principal, on the grounds that: (a) around 03:10, the Defendant opened the entrance door in front of 101, 701, 701, and the victim from opening the entrance door and opened the entrance door; (b) Defendant A assaulted the victim’s inside part of the victim with drinking and hand 3-4 times on the floor of drinking and hand knick; and (c) Defendant B assaulted the victim’s inside part of the victim with the Defendant A with 2-3 knife by drinking and drinking knife knife knife knife knif.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victims about two weeks of medical treatment, such as spambry, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. Determination of the defendants' defense counsel's assertion of the damaged party photographs (D)

1. The allegation that Defendant B inflicted an injury on the victim is self-defense to prevent the victim from inflicting an injury on the Defendant A.

2. The circumstances revealed by each evidence revealed in the judgment, namely, Defendant A intruded the victim’s house by inserting his head with his house window at the time of the ruling, and thereafter became aware that there was a woman at the victim’s house. In the process, the victim was assaulted by the Defendants, and the victim was unilaterally committed a harmful act against Defendant A.