logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.01 2017고정542
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of QM5 car.

1. On November 6, 2013, around 13:13, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance on the road near the tunnel in the city of the Gu, a city located in the Yannam-gun of the Namnam-do before the end of November, 2013.

2. On November 7, 2013, around 13:27, the Defendant operated the said car not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near the valley in the Dongdong-dong, Gwangju Mine-gu.

3. On December 6, 2013, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance on the road near the west Shodong located in the west-dong at the front week.

4. On February 8, 2014, around 03:47, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance on the D charging station near Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

5. On February 28, 2014, at around 15:03, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near the naval village, among those located in Sejong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North Korea.

6. On March 27, 2014, around 09:40, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance, on the road near the camba-dong of the Government of the Republic of Korea, in the vicinity of the camba-dong.

7. On April 1, 2014, from around 16:16 to 16:35 of the same day, the Defendant operated the said car not covered by mandatory insurance, from the 4th Sinsan-si, a Sinsan-si, a neighboring apartment complex, to the road near the Seoul outer Highway from the 28.6km (from the ICIC to the Guri-si), to the road near the 28.6km away from the Seoul outer Highway (hereinafter referred to as the “Guri-si”).

8. On April 8, 2014, from around 04:29 to 04:51, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance to the expressway, among the vehicles located in the frighting frighted fright, in the case of a while on the road near the point of 251.8km in the middle-speed highway.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Compulsory insurance contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about non-insurance operating vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the former Guarantee of Automobile Compensation (Law No. 1300, Jan. 6, 2015).

arrow