logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.26 2015노5669
영유아보육법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Although the Defendant’s husband, who is the husband of the reason for appeal, worked in the child-care center of this case every day as a teacher at the workplace, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the charges of illegal receipt of subsidies by false report of this case on the premise that D did not actually work as a teacher at the workplace.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The Defendant also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the lower court rejected the above assertion in detail, with the detailed statement of the judgment on the argument under the title “determination of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion.”

Examining the above judgment of the court below after comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and this part of the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. In accordance with Articles 191 (1), 190 (1), and the main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that all of the costs of the trial by the court below and the party shall be borne by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow