logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.21 2018고정615
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

On December 5, 2017, the Defendant in the factory office caused a large amount of money in return for the damage of the D organization that caused the flag by misrepresenting the removal of the removal to the removal of the Gu, and caused the case in front of the 2006 E in return for the damage of the D organization that caused the accident to the D,” and “F retireds giving the removal to the G,” and “G himself was the personnel of the NIS,” thereby openly posting false facts that are inconsistent with the actual facts to the public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Maz.

1. According to the records of this case, the following facts are recognized.

Defendant

In addition, as the victims of the fraud who invested in H, G was affiliated with the “I organization,” which is the victim’s meeting. At present, G withdraws from the said “I organization,” and is engaged in activities as the representative of the “J organization,” which is the other victims’ meeting.

The Defendant posted each of the following articles on the Internet B portal site C C C C page, which can be called the above H's meetings:

A. On December 5, 2017, around 12:56, 2017, the title “K” included the purport that G is disclosing the truth of the instant case on November 2, 2006, with respect to G, and the title of D organization (representative L; hereinafter “D organization”)’s main text was omitted and posted as it is, on December 4, 2017.

As above, the press opinion of the D organization posted by the defendant: ① At the time of 2006, the D organization collective representative G was elected by misrepresenting the removal citizens, resulting in the case on November 2, 2006, after being elected from the joint representative of D organization, resulting in the case on November 2, 2006, and was locked. ② The notification that G was involved in the removal of services to disarm the area of D organization, and the result of the removal was given to G. (2) At the same time, the F retirees were urged to investigate the truth of the destruction of D organization.

arrow