The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of 8 months sentenced by the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant agreed with J, L, M, N,O, C, P, Q, and R among the victims of each of the instant crimes, and the injury of victims not agreed upon by the Defendant was partially recovered, the Defendant recognized the instant crime and was in profoundly against the Defendant’s living under confinement for about six months, and the economic situation of the Defendant is not good.

However, each of the crimes of this case was obtained by receiving advance payment of travel expenses from the victims who planned travel, and the case is not less and less in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime, the number of victims, and the amount of damage. The victim I with the largest amount of damage was not agreed to the trial. The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case as long as he had been under suspension of execution due to the fraud of the same veterinary act, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case as long as he had been under suspension of execution, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment, family relationship, occupation, and circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, etc., the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.