logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.05.10 2017고단2819
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2819] Defendant is an employee of a company exporting figures to China through mobile phones around June 25, 2017.

In order to save taxes, it is necessary to collect Chinese money received from export proceeds from selling it to Korean people, and upon receiving a proposal that "3% of the face-to-face withdrawals will be made after receiving and delivering the money in lieu of the defendant's account in the name of the defendant," a large number of passbooks will be used.

찝찝해서 못 나가겠습니다.

199 Egypt 80

It may be used for the crime of fraud if a person without a name, who gives reply or otherwise makes another person use his account.

In spite of his thought, the number of each account of (B) and the Saemaul Treasury Account (C) was known to the person who was named in the name of the defendant using a mobile phone.

Accordingly, on June 26, 2017, the name-freeist refers to false phone calls from the victim D to “to transfer expenses incurred in obtaining a loan of KRW 60 million by raising credit rating.” The above company bank account and Saemaul Treasury account, etc. notified the victim D of the above company bank account and its affiliated amount to the E company bank account (F) around June 29, 2017, KRW 6 million; around June 30, 2017, KRW 7 million to the above company bank account; KRW 5 million to the above Saemaul Bank account; and KRW 18 million to the above Saemaul Bank account; and on June 30, 2017, it is suspected that he/she continued to receive a transfer of KRW 5 million to the above company account and received a false transfer of KRW 10 million from the victim G at a place unknown to the prosecution office at around June 30, 2017 to the above company account; and only 50 million account is confirmed to have been returned to the said company account.”

After June 30, 2017, the Defendant deposited money into the account in the name of the above Defendant from the person who was in the name of the above defendant.

arrow