logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.01.23 2018고단2777
폭행등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. At around 16:00 on February 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) came to know that the victim was taking a dynamic image to file a civil petition when he/she was in dispute with the victim D and the Defendant’s educational attitude at C office located in Jeju-si B; and (b) when he/she demanded to delete the dynamic image taken by the victim, he/she in his/her hand, and assaulted the victim, such as plucking, plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of flapsing the victim’s flaps and pling, etc. of b

B. Intimidation: (a) the date and time indicated in Paragraph (1) of this Article; and (b) the victim’s cell phone, which used the victim’s e mobile phone, in order to return the victim’s cell phone from the victim to the victim, the victim threatened the victim with the defect of the phone using the victim’s cell phone, i.e., e., e., the victim’s cell phone outside of the office, and the victim’s cell phone, i.e., e., the victim’s cell phone, e., the victim’s cell phone.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Articles 260 (3) and 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. On September 3, 2018, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim submitted a written agreement that expresses his/her wish not to punish the Defendant.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow