Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a vessel block processing business (oilB) in Gunsan-si C.

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, from August 1, 2015 to November 17, 2015, the Defendant employed 9 foreigners who do not have the status of stay that does not have the status of stay that allows employment from the above Item B from around August 1, 2015 to the status of stay that does not enable employment, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. Defendant B, a corporation established for the purpose of processing vessel blocks, employed 9 foreigners on the list of crimes in the attached Form No. 1, who did not have the status of stay for job-seeking activities as set forth in paragraph 1, at the same date and place as that of the above A, its representative, and at the same time and place as that of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Opinion on E preparation;

1. A copy of the certificate of employment of foreigners;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 94 subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 99-3 subparag. 2, Article 94 subparag. 9, and Article 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act; selection of fines

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the Defendants on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.