A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 13:40 on April 16, 2019, the Defendant of special obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) while driving a 35-mactor on the front of the road located in Asan City B, the Defendant did not stop without stopping even though he was ordered to stop from E details of the police box belonging to the Asan Police Station D police station, and the guard F; (b) the Defendant was prevented by the above police officers by blocking the above Tracker by the G patrol vehicle; and (c) the Bacer part after the said patrol vehicle was moved off three times in front of the Tracter of the Defendant’s driving; and (d) E demanded the Defendant to leave the Trackor to stop the way on which he was carrying dangerous goods, such as “No. 9. Traffic violation must be carried,” and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on roads concerning the prevention of danger.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods by destroying the 1,343,266 patrol vehicles belonging to the Asan Police Station to repair the 112 patrol vehicles belonging to the Asan Police Station in the same manner as stated in paragraph (1), at the time and place as stated in paragraph (1), and thereby impairing the utility of the said patrol vehicles used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report by the police on E (the statement by the police officer present at the same time);

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the statutes governing a motor vehicle estimate;

1. Articles 144(1), 136(1) (special obstruction of performance of official duties) and 141(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant's use of violence against police officers in the course of performing official duties under the influence of alcohol is bad, the defendant's use of violence is more serious, and the defendant's act of violence is against the defendant.