Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On May 4, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).
【Criminal Facts】
1. On September 25, 2019, the Defendant driven C Laren vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.05% from the address in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the Seoul Dobong-gu road without obtaining a driver’s license, around September 23:18, 2019.
As a result, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the prohibition of drunk driving twice.
2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car of rocketing siren.
On September 25, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on September 23:18, 2019, and driven the two-lane front B of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with two-lanes in front of the vehicle driver's license, using one-lane distance from the middle distance of justice with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05%.
At the time, the center line of the yellow-ray was installed at night and there was a place where the yellow-ray was installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents due to the failure of the Defendant, who is engaged in driving service, to live well at the front and right-hand traffic situation and to do so.
Nevertheless, in order to proceed to the road immediately facing this, the defendant neglected to turn to the left, and led the victim D (the aged 32) driven by the driver D(the aged 32) driving on the road facing the center line to the normal driving direction by the negligence of the festing the center line, which led to the shocking part of the part above the left one of the above car.
After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the damage to the left-hand lefranc pipe and the damage to the second lefranc, which requires a medical treatment for about six weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1..