logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원마산지원 2017.09.14 2016가단8742
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On July 15, 1991, the Plaintiff asserted that the cause of the claim was purchased from D before Changwon-si E. In this case, the Plaintiff purchased the part inside the ship connecting each point of the F with the indication of the attached drawings among the forest land in Changwon-si, Changwon-si (hereinafter “the instant forest land”).

In the meantime, when the Plaintiff purchased land from G on November 8, 1994, the land of H and 17 parcels of the forest of this case, the Plaintiff purchased, together with the indication of drawings (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (5), (5), (3), (5), (4), (5), (5), (3), (5), (8), (4), and (6) part of the ship connected each point in sequence, and (2,021 square meters (hereinafter “the land of this case (B)”), and disposed of part of the reduced trees, and used it as the Ba five farms

As such, the Plaintiff continued to possess the land of this case from December 31, 1994 (the payment date of the balance in the sales contract withG) with its own intention, and as such, the acquisition by prescription was completed on December 31, 2014 after the lapse of 20 years.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession on December 31, 2014 with respect to the land of this case (A) and (b).

2. A person who possesses real estate in peace and openly and openly with the intention of possession for twenty years of determination shall acquire its ownership by filing for registration.

(Article 245(1) of the Civil Act. In full view of the following circumstances, even if all evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, such as the statements or images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness I, G, and F, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff has continuously occupied the land Nos. 1 and (b) with its intention to own the land for twenty (20) years from December 31, 1994.

1. The testimony of witness F and all pleadings.

arrow