logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.21 2015고단1756
근로기준법위반등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative director of C in B, who ordinarily employs six workers and operates funeral business. From July 17, 2013 to October 25, 2014, the Defendant did not pay 4,064,516 and retirement allowance 2,243,290 won from the date of retirement to 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties, and did not pay 27,858,280 won and total retirement allowance 26,454,010 won from the date of retirement as shown in the attached list of crimes.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the charges is an offense falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act is an offense falling under Article 44 subparag. 1 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act, and the charge for failure to pay each of the retirement allowances is an offense falling under Article 44 subparag. 1 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act, which

However, according to the records, the victim D could recognize the fact that the victim D had withdrawn his/her wish to punish each defendant on June 17, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case, and on June 17, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case, the remaining victims have been instituted. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow