(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2015가단5353681

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2015가단5353681

청구이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is a notarial deed No. 2322, 2015, drawn up by the law firm office and office on August 13, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 13, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an insurance solicitor commission agreement with the Defendant and agreed to perform the following matters as a person engaged in the insurance solicitation business (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Plaintiff entered into a promissory note No. 2322, which was signed by the Plaintiff on August 13, 2015 by the issuer, payee, and face value 30 million won for the Defendant (a notary public, a notary public, drafted a notarial deed (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”).

① The Plaintiff shall faithfully perform the duties entrusted by the Defendant from the date of a commissioning contract to the date of withdrawal from the office, and agrees to fully understand and implement the important provisions specified in the commissioning Contract and the Annex Agreement concluded with the Defendant.

② The Plaintiff’s prepaid insurance solicitation commission, etc. that the Defendant received from the Defendant is promising to promptly return to the Defendant the full sum of the insurance solicitation commission, etc. for the following insurance contracts among the commission received at the time of the occurrence of the following:

1) A normal contract with the Plaintiff was concluded, but the contract was terminated, terminated, or terminated due to the failure to maintain the fees, etc. (ii) where the contract was terminated, terminated, or terminated or terminated due to the violation of the quality guarantee system, and the contract was converted into another insurance, regardless of the period of three years or the company paying the fees, and (iii) where the contract was terminated, terminated, invalidated, or invalidated due to the customer’s civil petition filing, regardless of the period of three years or the company paying the fees, issues a promissory note for notarial acts in order to secure the refund of the fees and damages for delay, and agrees to enforce the Plaintiff

B. Defendant and stock company.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.11.18 2015가단127299

-대구지방법원의성지원 2017.06.21 2016가단2057

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.24 2018나43967

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.16 2015나3128

-서울남부지방법원 2017.10.26 2017가단12534