1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 1,800,000 and as regards it, July 2014.

According to each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4-2, it can be recognized that the facts of the reasons for the claim are stated in the attached Form, and no counter-proof exists.

(1) According to the above facts of recognition, since a lease contract on a building listed in the separate sheet between the plaintiff and the defendant is terminated or terminated, the defendant delivers the above building to the plaintiff, and as requested by the plaintiff, the plaintiff pays the overdue rent of 1.8 million won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from July 24, 2014 to the day following the delivery date of the copy of the complaint in this case to the day of complete payment. The plaintiff is obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of 700,000 won per month from July 24, 2014 to the day after delivery of the building in this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.