logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.26 2018나2015336
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that of the first instance judgment, except for adding "No. 12" to "Evidence No. 14-2, 16, 17" to "Evidence No. 14-2, 17" to "Evidence No. 14-2, 16, and 17" to "Evidence No. 12" in the third instance judgment and "Evidence No. 12" to "Evidence No. 12, 12-13", and the evidence No. 6. 4 is the same as that of the second instance judgment. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted as reasonable.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal against it is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow