logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고단6961
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a loan business in the name of "C (State)" on the second and second floor in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si.

On September 2014, the Defendant: (a) acquired commercial bonds and KRW 10,000,000,000, the principal amount of which is 4-5%; (b) obtained 120,000,000,000 won from a non-explosion who became aware of in the Internet car page; and (c) applied for the total amount of 30,000,000 won from March 5, 2015 to August 25, 2015 by accessing the Supreme Court’s electronic litigation system at the above office to the Busan District Court’s branch branch; (d) obtained 2015,00,000 won from the above office; and (e) applied for the electronic payment order to pay KRW 450,00,000,000,000 from March 5, 2015 to August 25, 2015; and (e) applied for the electronic payment order as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired another person's right and carried out his right by means of lawsuit, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Payment order (the case of 6325 won before the Busan District Court's East Branch Court's 2015)

1. The current status of C (State) claims for electronic payment orders and the status of issuance of authentic copies;

1. Loan business registration certificate, certified copy of corporate registry, and business registration certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 112 of the Act (Concurrent punishment of imprisonment and a fine) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is committed when the defendant acquired a claim from the registered credit service provider or the unregistered credit service provider and carried out the right by the method of payment order, etc., and the crime is serious in light of the period, method, and scale of the crime.

However, it is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case.

arrow