A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2014, around 15:07, the Defendant, in front of the Incheon Southern Police Station D District of the Incheonnam Police Station located in Incheon, who was punished for trial expenses due to taxi fare and was in the presence of the taxi fee, was fluored by a fluor, “Chewing fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluoring fluor, fluoring fluor, fluoring fluor, and fluoring fluor, fluoring fluor, fluoring fluoring fluoring

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Categories of Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties] There is no person who has been forced to perform official duties (special and general sentencing) (the scope of decision-making and recommendation-making in the recommended area]: Six months to one year and four months;

2. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the sentencing data, including the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment since 1996 except that the defendant who was sentenced to a fine twice or more in this previous case, the police officer after the shouldering in the alcoholic beverage expressed his intention of apology, and the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all other sentencing data.