A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Northern District Court on June, 2015, and on May 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won or more for a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 7, 2015.

On May 6, 2017, the Defendant driven a 1 kilometerd car with alcohol content of 0.156% at around 23:00, while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.156% during blood, from the land in which the Suwon-si hand-on is not more than that of the Suwon-si, the Defendant driven a 1 kilometerd car at around the same 1 kilometer to the pawned distance of the culture center in the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of inquiry, inquiry, application of Acts and subordinate statutes (reports attached to criminal suspects' judgments and reports);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant had been punished for two times due to driving under the influence of alcohol in the past, but the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the suspension of execution, and considering the fact that the amount of alcohol concentration in blood during the instant crime is highly high to 0.156% at the time of the instant crime, considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime and the fact that the Defendant reflects the wrongness.