Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant agreed to run a singing and reporting room business using the two-story offices of the building owned by the Defendant’s friendship with C, and provided C with KRW 6,100,000 as investment money, and around the 24th day of the same month, the Defendant allowed C to open one cell phone in the name of the Defendant.

In addition, the same year

3.4. At around 4.Around the day, C consented to the addition of three mobile phones in the name of the defendant, and D agreed to the opening of three mobile phones in the name of the defendant by phone to the defendant, and agreed to the opening of three mobile phones in the name of the defendant.

However, in opposition to the above business, the relationship between the defendant and C was reversed, and the defendant demanded C to return 6.1 million won of the investment amount, but C refused it, and the defendant's refusal was the same year in the name of the defendant.

3. The same year with respect to three mobile phones opened around April 1, 200, in order to make a false report to the effect that C or D opened a mobile phone in the name of the defendant by forging the name of the defendant.

4. On March 4, 2015, the public service center of the Ansan-gu Police Station submitted a complaint to the effect that “D and C arbitrarily opened a mobile phone using the name of the complainant and thus, they would be punished.”

Accordingly, the defendant was arrested by D and C for the purpose of having criminal punishment imposed on D and C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 (Confession) of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing is that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and the defendant is transferred to the investigation stage.