1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) At each of the primary claims, KRW 16 million, as well as for each of the primary claims.

1. The judgment network E on the primary claim (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on September 29, 2013. The deceased’s heir is the Plaintiffs, the Defendant, and the F, who are the deceased’s children, and the facts of the deceased, may be acknowledged by taking full account of the overall purport of the pleadings on the records in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).

The Plaintiffs: (i) around the end of August 209: (ii) KRW 409,02,260 (i) G apartment KRW 115,201; KRW 31,02,260; (iii) KRW 400,000; (iv) KRW 404; (iv) KRW 600,000; KRW 404; and (iv) KRW 406; and (v) KRW 400,00,000, KRW 400; and (iv) KRW 406; and (iv) KRW 406; and (v) KRW 404; and (v) KRW 406; and (v) KRW 94; and (v) KRW 400,00,00,000; and (v) KRW 94,000; and (v) KRW 209; and (v) KRW 407,193.13.

The fact that the property remaining at the time of the deceased’s death is KRW 80 million is the defendant, but the statement in Gap’s evidence No. 11, 14, 16, 17, and Eul evidence No. 1 is written.