logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.16 2017고단326
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 7, 2017, the Defendant reported to 112 on the Defendant’s pro-Japanese 101, the 5th apartment of the 5th city, the 101st city, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “UG”) of the 105th city, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Police statements B;

1. Photographs of a damaged police officer;

1. Application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects the depth of the sentencing, the degree of assault by police officers is not severe, and it appears that the defendant committed a contingent crime by drinking without any other criminal record except a fine for drinking in 2009, and the defendant complains of his wife for the childcare of his father and wife, etc. shall be determined as ordered by taking full account of various factors of sentencing such as the defendant's age, criminal record, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow