beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. The facts charged of this case
A. From May 2006 to June 30, 2014, the Defendant served as a representative director of H (State).
B. At around May 2006, I established (ju) H around 2001 with investors and led a project to develop the forest of Gangseo-si (JJ 423,922 square meters, approximately 130,00 square meters, and 130,000 square meters, and hereinafter “the forest of this case”) with the investors, and went beyond the status of the representative director of H (ju) around 2006.
(c)
I entered into a contract on July 8, 2003 to purchase the instant forest under the name of H in the purchase price of KRW 3.8 billion, and after the Defendant became the representative director of H in the name of Y, he received approximately KRW 3.8 billion loan from Y on June 30, 2006 and paid the purchase price of the instant forest under the name of H in full.
(d)
In order to prepare for compulsory execution, etc. by concerns over the loss of ownership of the forest land when the lawsuit, seizure and provisional seizure related to the forest land of this case were repeated due to the credit obligation relationship occurred at the time I led the development project of this case, the Defendant paid 1.65 billion won of the remainder of the loans at the location of Gangseo-si District Branch on January 20, 2010, and was in a close relationship with the Defendant.
L, which has been granted a certain amount of KRW 1,650,000,000 which he prepared, had L keep the check on the back of the check, and then deliver it to L on the back of the check, and pay the balance of the loan, and deliver the original copy of the certificate of subrogated performance from L [the defendant received a copy of the above certificate of subrogated performance to L on the same day, and borrowed KRW 1,650,000,000 from L to this M (the Defendant’s wife).
“The loan certificate was prepared, and even if the loan was fully repaid, the registration of establishment of the right to collateral security in the name of the Suhyup was not cancelled.” E. The Defendant instructed N, an employee, on August 17, 2010, that “H” was 1.65 billion won per annum from L on January 20, 2010, and 12% per annum.