beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a contact with the defendant.
At around 11:30 on 14. 14. 203. 11. 11. 30, the Defendant used a melting machine for the installation of entrance, and the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent fire due to a melting flame, such as removal of the spunch, etc. or blocking the surrounding area of the spunching machine with incombustible material, etc., because there are materials with strong infunching such as spunching, etc. around this place.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to take any measure and transferred the flame to a spunching place in the vicinity without taking any measure, and continuously destroyed the amount of KRW 289,169,650, such as two prefabricated steel structure sand site storage units (391m2) owned by the non-breadth C and the bags located therein, and destroyed the amount of KRW 132,572,00,000, such as the F block structure and sand site location panel factories owned by E (60m2) and the kimchi in the above warehouse.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement to G, E, and C;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the investigation of each police, reports on the results of field identification at the police site;
1. Article 171 of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, Articles 170(1) and 166(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a punishment; Article 166(1) of the Criminal Act of the Defendant is a person who does not have any national technical qualification of an adjacent professional engineer, etc.; and the Defendant took a certain degree of safety measure prior to the adjacent work (in the event that a fire occurs due to a substitute weather (e.g., e., e., e., flame retardant sets and a flame retardant strings without flame retardation function) because he/she did not take a sufficient safety measure (e.g., the installation of flame retardant sets and fireworks), and the damage amount is very large; although the damaged factory is a fire insurance, it seems that the insurance amount is not high even if the damaged factory is involved in the