logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.05.08 2014가단8405
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The registration of ownership preservation was completed in the name of F on March 7, 1935 in Ansan-si E, E, 681 square meters (hereinafter “instant E”). G completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 6902 on December 23, 1969 on December 22, 1969 with respect to the portion of 112/324 of the said E’s land.

B. On December 24, 1963, the registration of ownership preservation was completed in the Republic of Korea on the following grounds: (a) on July 13, 2012, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 16, 2012 on the ground that the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the following grounds: (b) the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Republic of Korea; and (c) the registration was completed on July 16, 2012.

C. The land cadastre of the instant H land is drafted and managed, but there is no land cadastre for the instant land E.

In the Gu register of H land of this case, G is registered as co-owners with respect to 112/324 of the above land.

G died on or around February 2012, and Plaintiff B’s spouse, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D are their children and all their successors.

E. The instant H land acquired through consultation on July 16, 2012 at the Korea Land and Housing Corporation and paid KRW 208,159,000 to its owner.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including numbers), the fact inquiry result against the Korean Land and Housing Corporation of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The plaintiffs asserted that G, the decedent of the plaintiffs, was aware of and purchased the site of the building that G, the decedent of the plaintiffs, had resided from around 1948, with the land of this case, and that is, due to the erroneous registry and management of the ledger by the defendants, ① co-owners, including G, including G, in the process of computerization of the land cadastre of the defendant Ansan market while G was clearly registered as co-owners.

arrow