A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Criminal facts

On September 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the charge of forging private documents, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on July 17, 2018.

1. On April 5, 2020, the Defendant, at around 21:00, was to provide accommodation in the state of non-payment of accommodation expenses under the influence of alcohol in the “Dratium” in the operation of the Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon, and the Defendant, while disputing one another with the victim, should not be deemed to have why he would be able to shot and shot.

(2) On April 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 22:05 on the front side of the victim’s entrance, and was asked by the Inspector F, a police officer belonging to the Daejeon Pream Station E District; and (b) during the course of the instant case, the Defendant 2:05 on April 22, 202, the Defendant 2:05 asked the victim about the background of the instant case, the Defendant 112 of his own sound; and (c) the Defendant 2:45 on May 2, 200, the Defendant 2:2:00 the Defendant 2:2:0 and 3:00 of the Defendant 112 of the Seoul Pream Station E District; and (d) the Defendant 2:12 of the 3rd F’s rank attached to the shoulder of the said F, making the Defendant a handout, and 3:4:4; and (d) the Defendant 2.

"Fel off," and flaged on the left ear and neck of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. C Police Statements;

1. A facam images or facopic images facopics;

1. Reporting on investigation, witness statements and application of the statutes governing saves visual images;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the defendant's mistake in sentencing is recognized under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.