The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

With regard to the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing) of the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below, "a motor vehicle operated by the victim due to an accident caused by the defendant, which is damaged by the sum of 2,593,787 won, such as the replacement of an observer car by even a door, which is equivalent to the 2,593,787 won, is presumed to have been damaged by the defendant, which is premised on the fact that the defendant destroyed the defendant's witness, image of the scene of the accident, voice of CD (hereinafter referred to as such video file) by integrating the testimony of G in writing a written estimate, the video of the scene of the accident, and

It is difficult to see that the above repair cost is excessive.

The punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, etc.) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In fact, the following facts or circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the first instance court as to the assertion of mistake, i.e., a written estimate of G Preparation, which served as the basis for the repair cost stated in the facts constituting the original facts of the crime, was prepared on the left side of the damaged vehicle and on the premise that the crime was destroyed by the lower court and the lower court and the lower court and the lower court, and ② the witness G of the original instance court, “if a vehicle is attached to a straight-down vehicle and the left left-hand vehicle, the aspect as the damaged vehicle

The second part of the shoulderer should be well aware, but it should be recognized that the latter flicker is flick.

“In the instant case, the Defendant testified to the effect that all the damaged vehicles are likely to be damaged by both the side of the damaged vehicle and the subsequent pans, and ③ the testimony of the witness D and the video of the scene of the accident can be acknowledged as having been damaged to the left part of the damaged vehicle immediately after the instant accident. The victim driven the vehicle in the same state prior to the instant accident.

It is difficult to see that the spread was damaged due to the instant accident.

보는 것이 합리적인 점, ④ CD( 동 영상 파일) 의 음성에 의하면 이 사건 사고 당시의 충격음이 ' 쿵‘ 하는 순간 적인...