1. The part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked:

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 19, 2014, at around 07:10, a vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant taxi”) used the direction direction, etc. on the right side while driving from the northwest of the Hannam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul to the southwest of the 5 lane in the southwest of the Hannam-gu, Seoul, along the 3 lane of the 5 lane in the southwest of the Hannam-dong, the direction of the right side was turned on, and changed to the 4 lane, and changed to the 3 lane again before leaving the 3 lane completely.

On the other hand, the vehicle B (the driver C, hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) proceeding in three lanes following the Defendant vehicle, and the direction of the Defendant taxi on the front side and the change from three lanes to four lanes, and the Defendant taxi tried to change the three lanes into the left side of the Defendant taxi by using the left side of the three lanes before the completion of the change of the vehicle, and the two-lanes conflict between the front side of the Defendant taxi and the front side of the right side of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On September 18, 2014, the Plaintiff was an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff Company, and paid KRW 317,00 as insurance proceeds at the repair cost of the Plaintiff Company. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a mutual aid contract with the Defendant taxi.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, each entry or video of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and purport of whole pleadings]

2. Determination

A. The negligence ratio was at fault, when the defendant taxi turn on the right direction, changed the lane to the right line, and was at fault again to the left-hand line without any direction direction, etc. before completing the change of the vehicle line. Meanwhile, the plaintiff taxi following the defendant taxi in accordance with the three-lane, when the defendant taxi turned on the direction direction, etc. of the defendant taxi and the vehicle changed to the four-lane, the defendant taxi is driving on the other three-lanes after completing the change of the vehicle line, or the plaintiff taxi is changing to the two-lanes.