beta
Text
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;
2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.
Reasons
1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.
On July 5, 2017 at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A, the insured vehicle A, and the insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle") in the vicinity of the D Hospital located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu at the location of the location on July 22, 2017 at the time of the accident, proceeds as one-lane of the four-lanes of the above road (the two-lanes are straight lines, the two-lanes are straight lines, and the two-lanes are straight lines). On the left side of the Defendant Insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant vehicle") who was left at the two-lanes of the above road at the end of the end of the end of the accident, and the two-lanes, 90,000 won of the self-paid share of the insured vehicle in the front of the right side of the Plaintiff vehicle [based], there is no dispute over the fact that there is no dispute over the issue, Gap, 1, 2, 4 through 9 (Ga number), 2 through 8 and video evidence.
2. As to the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant driver’s negligence was 100%, and claimed the full amount of the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff and damages for delay from the day following the date of the final payment.
First of all, we examine the argument that the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle is 100%.
All the circumstances such as the fact of recognition and the details of the accident, the degree of conflict and shock, and in particular, the driver of the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle are in violation of the laws and regulations, namely, the driver of the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle shall comply with the signal or instruction indicated by the traffic safety facilities (Article 5(1) of the Road Traffic Act). On the road along which the lane is installed, the vehicle and the driver shall pass along the lane (Article 14(3) of the Road Traffic Act). The accident in this case was investigated as the accident in which the driver and the employee dispatched to the site at the time of the accident was in violation of the direction of driving the vehicle and the inspection of the plaintiff and the employee who sent to the site at the
In light of (Evidence A)., at the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle is located.