A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 31, 2018, at around 01:0, the Defendant assaulted to the public service center of the Dong police station located in the name of Busan Dong-gu, Busan, about 70, in front of the public service of the public service center of the police station of the Dong police station, who was on a taxi operated by C and did not pay the taxi fee, on the grounds that the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee from D (20) with a compulsory police officer who was on duty in the above police station on his/her own hand, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by assaulting him/her at one time in the manner that he/she did not pay the taxi fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a wooden statement) and a report on investigation (CCCTV image);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition (Options of imprisonment);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1248, Apr. 1,

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as the observation of protection and order to attend lectures and the order to provide community service;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to June) of the basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria shall not interfere with the execution of public duties;

2. Although the Defendant had been already punished more than once by exercising violence in the state of his or her taking advantage of the same kind of crime as well as violence, he or she again committed the instant crime, the Defendant is deemed to have led to his or her confession, his or her mistake is divided, his or her age and family circumstances are considered, and the Defendant’s age and family conditions are considered as ordered.