logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.08.25 2016고단106
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D posted a letter of intent to sell Onnuri gift certificates on the Internet at his own house located in Jindo-gun E, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and reported this fact to the victim D who contacted with the Defendant.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not intend to deliver the above goods.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 300,000 won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the father F of the defendant.

2. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant against the victim C posted a letter to sell Onnuri gift certificates on the Internet’s home located in Jindo-gun E, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and reported this fact to the victim C who contacted with the Defendant.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not intend to deliver the above goods.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 300,000 won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the father F of the defendant.

3. On January 7, 2016, the Defendant against the victim G posted a letter at his own house located in Jindo-gun E around 18:44, stating that he would deposit a small amount of money at the site equal to the settlement amount, and then, the Defendant would deposit KRW 170,000 on the part of the victim G who reported it.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant plans to acquire money by means of making payment through the personal information of the victim and overcoming the settlement amount, and there was no intention to deposit money equivalent to the settlement amount with the victim.

The defendant is the victim as above.

arrow