The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case and the fact that the defendant was not sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or more, and that the instant sea-related vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the following is ruled again

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged by the defendant and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 4 (1) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision on the Grounds for Appeal);