logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.04.24 2014고단456
위계공무집행방해
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2. However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The C Editor and Defendant B are university students attending the department of new technology at D University, who are opposing the WCC (WCC-WCC-MUD).

The Defendants knew that the opening tendency pursued by them and other WCC Busan Congress were held in Busan Becco, and agreed to make a false 112 report that explosives are installed around the event site for the purpose of obstructing them.

On October 29, 2013, at around 09:31, 2013, Defendants A reported that “WCC Busan was equipped with terrorist explosives because they had been present at the 112 general situation room conference in front of the Fridge conference located in Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu,” and Defendant B was waiting to receive clothes when Defendant A completed the 112 report. The 112 report was sent to the FCC Busan Metropolitan Government Assembly. The 112 report was sent to Defendant B, on the following grounds: (a) Defendant B was aware of their criminal acts, and (b) was waiting to receive clothes when Defendant A had been able to receive clothes if Defendant A had been on the 112 report.

According to the above false 112 report, the Defendants confirmed the location of the transmitting public telephone call, and sent the above contents to the situation room of the Busan Coast Guard Police Station, which is the competent police station, so that 57 police officials such as the head of the criminal and the head of the duty team, and 7 military public officials were dispatched to the surrounding area of the public telephone terminal and the veckco held by the WCC Busan General Assembly to search around the surrounding area in order to discover and remove explosives.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

2. A report on internal investigation (the securing of images of the raised report) 3.

arrow