(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고합18

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고합18

살인

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-three years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is residing in the fourth floor of the building located in Jeju-si, and the victim D (70 years of age) who is the pro-friendly victim of the defendant owns the above building and operates the "E K King practice room" on the second floor.

In the process of divorce with wife in 2003, the defendant transferred the name of the victim in Jeju City F, which was the name of the defendant in the name of the defendant in the name of the wife in Jeju City, and the victim did not have to have access due to mutual appraisal.

On January 4, 2014, at around 16:00 to 18:20, the Defendant met the victim who had been preparing for business in the instant singing practice room, and subsequently, had the victim murdered by having the victim by having his face and part of the face and part of the Defendant taken several times due to eating, drinking, etc. while having a good appraisal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and I;

1. The entry of witnesses J, K and L in the third protocol of trial, and the entry of witnesses M and N in the fourth protocol of trial;

1.Each seizure record, internal investigation report, each investigation report and the result of the autopsy participation;

1. An appraisal report, a autopsy appraisal report, or a genetic test appraisal report;

1. Details of currency;

1. Application of subordinate statutes to assistant inspectors;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the accused and his defense counsel under the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 250(1) of the Selective Punishment Act

1. The defendant did not kill the victim;

A. The gist of the assertion is that the victim, on the day of the instant case, did not go through a dispute due to the transfer of the name of the orchard (hereinafter “the instant orchard”) located in Jeju-si in the name of the Defendant “Esing practice room” (hereinafter “Esing practice room”). The victim, who was the victim of the instant claim, fladdled the Defendant’s neck and chest, was flad with the Defendant, and the Defendant got out of the victim while flading it.

참조조문

-형법 제250조 제1항

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가합532

-대전지방법원 2013.08.08 2012고단2988

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.03 2012고단1057

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.08 2013고정898

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.05.30 2012고합194