All appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (one year of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We also examine the judgment prosecutor and the defendant's arguments. In light of the favorable circumstances that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case, that the defendant reflects the wrong, that is favorable to the administration of a single medication, that is, the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by the administration of narcotics, etc., the crime of narcotics need to be strictly punished and eradicated. The defendant again commits the crime of this case even though he had been sentenced to imprisonment five times for the same crime, and that the defendant again commits the crime of this case even though he had the record of committing the crime of the same kind, and that the defendant's strophopic ingredients were detected from the mother's hair, it seems that the degree of phiphopic addiction might not be less easily applied to the defendant's phiphoponism, the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines of

The sentence imposed by the court below is reasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., since both the prosecutor and the defendant's assertion are without merit.

3. If so, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.