logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2012.05.09 2011고정887
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant is a person who drives a rocketing taxi.

On 03:50 on 26. 26. 06. 06. 26. 03:50, in order to drive the above vehicle on the street in front of the Sim-dong, Gyeongsan-si, Seoul, there is a duty of care to live well and safely and drive the vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to negligence, the victim was parked on the right-hand side of the EM7 vehicle, which was parked on the right-hand side of the proceeding, and the top and top of the EM7 vehicle was shocked with the victim's vehicle.

As a result, even though it damages approximately KRW 768,137 of the cost of repairing damaged vehicles, it did not take necessary measures as an accident driver.

In light of the fact that the actual damage of the damaged vehicle was insignificant (in the investigation record 9 pages, 18 pages), the shock of the accident was not significant in light of the situation of the damaged vehicle’s trial condition, the speed of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, road conditions, etc., and the Defendant’s behavior immediately after the instant traffic accident and the statement to this court, etc., it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone did not take necessary measures to prevent the above traffic danger and interference with the Defendant’s perception of the instant accident.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325.

arrow