Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2013, the Defendant driven the front road of 129, in the direction of the meteorological Ambassador distance, B CT 100 Obama, in the direction of the Korean Ambassador, from the direction of the meteorological Ambassador.

At the same time, the crosswalk was installed on the front door, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a right to drive the motor vehicle by reducing the speed and by checking well the right and the right of the front door and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as it is, instead of negligent negligence, received the victim C (at the age of 81) who crossed the above crosswalk in front of the above Otoba, and had it exceeded the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a thring of 10 weeks of medical treatment, by occupational negligence, to the right-hand pelle, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and report on a traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, who was engaged in delivery business at a middle restaurant, caused serious injury to the victim requiring about 10 weeks of medical treatment due to the shock of elderly victims while driving a two-wheeled vehicle, and the crime of this case is not easy. However, the defendant immediately reported 119 days immediately after the accident and carried out relief measures for the victim. After the accident, the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant is against the mistake of the defendant, and there is no criminal record exceeding the fine.