logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.10 2013노1695
명예훼손등
Text

The judgment of the first instance shall be reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. A. Of the facts charged in the instant case

(b).

Reasons

1. In relation to the mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to the gist of the grounds for appeal (i.e., defamation: 1. A., defamation of the facts charged of this case, the article contained in the official document sent by the Defendant is not false, but is not false, and there was no awareness of the Defendant’s public nature as a result of audit request, and there was no awareness of the Defendant’s public nature as to the defamation of the facts charged of this case 1.B., there was no fact that the Defendant forged the subcontract document. (ii) As to the violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., the Defendant only sent text messages several times to meet with the victim, and the Defendant did not repeatedly send text messages that cause apprehensions to the victim) and unfair

A. The facts charged of this case 1. A.

On November 1, 2010, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (1) The defendant, at the Industrial Bank of Korea D points located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around November 1, 2010, did not have conspired to commit a criminal act or has deserted his duties; (4) the director of the Industrial Bank of Korea requested the auditor G of the E-company (E) to conduct an audit and disposition of the E-company; (3) three months after the completion of the “H elementary school renovation work site” constructed in our country from among the difficulties of 3., but the executor E (State) is taking part in the work of a new event, such as neglecting his duties and duties and soliciting criminal acts, which are confirmed and confirmed through the construction cost funding committee, and thereby neglecting his duties and failing to comply with the request for return of the corporate account, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly sending a public notice stating that the crime is malicious.

(2) The judgment of this Court.

arrow