1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The reasoning of the court’s explanation is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for the addition of the judgment as stated in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the 2nd page 5 and 9’s correction of “Nos. 1 through 3” as “Nos. 1 and 3,” and the 3rd page 13’s correction of “Nos. 2 and 9’s correction of “Nos. 1 and 3” to “Nos. 1 and 3,” and the 3rd page 2, “The Plaintiff does not take any measure to verify the Defendant’s additional seal imprint in the 4nd page “Nos. 1 and 11, and the Defendant’s seal imprint was affixed on the 1st page of the instant payment, in view of the fact that the Defendant’s seal imprint was affixed to G,” but the Defendant’s additional seal imprint was written on the 4nd page “No. 1 and 11, and this case’s seal imprint was affixed to the Defendant’s seal imprint,” and the Defendant’s additional seal imprint was written on the 4nd page.

2. The Plaintiff may deliver to the Plaintiff a copy of the instant payment note and the Defendant’s resident registration certificate (Evidence No. 9), which copied the front and rear of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, and the owner’s resident registration certificate to the contractor.