logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.30 2011가합10860
금형비반환등
Text

1. On May 28, 2013, the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) filed against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 147,636,531 and KRW 112,00,000 among them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is a legal entity under the Commercial Act that manufactures and sells automobile parts, such as Aluminum zers, etc., and the defendant is a legal entity that manufactures and sells machinery parts, etc.

B. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on a total of five occasions from February 12, 2010 to July 16, 2010, the sum of nine gold bars, including the Defendant’s gold for the Defendant’s YFer YFr clocking process (hereinafter “each of the instant gold bars”).

) Contracts to manufacture and deliver the gold-type products (hereinafter referred to as “the gold-type production contract of this case”).

(1) The Plaintiff entered into a 0-type 0-type 17-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 10-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 10-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 10-type 0-type 0-type 10-type 0-type 0-type 6-type 0-type 0-type 19,000-type 19,000-type 0-type 6-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 6-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 0-type 10-year-type 19,000-year-type 0-type 6-type 0-type 3, 2010.

C. 1) The Defendant made a request for the production of a total of nine gold-types of this case to C and supplied it to the Plaintiff. From October 2010, the Defendant began to supply the Plaintiff with a human-schoolr tank part manufactured in the above gold-type. 2) The Plaintiff was a gold-type 2.

arrow